News

Court to rule on Patience Jonathan’s seized $15.5m October 7th

Justice
Babs Kuewumi of the Federal High Court in Lagos will on October 7th
deliver judgement on the case of the seized $15.5 million found in four
company accounts that have been linked to former First lady Patience
Jonathan.

The Nation reports that at the resumed hearing of the case yesterday September 27th, counsel to former
Special Adviser on Domestic Affairs to ex-President Goodluck Jonathan,
Waripamo Dudafa, who is also a defendant in the case,  urged the Federal
High Court to nullify the guilty plea by four companies that have been
linked to the case. The four companies in whose accounts the seized $15
million was found in, had on September 15th pleaded guilty to laundering the said amount when they were arraigned. 

The companies namely Pluto Property and Investment Company Ltd (represented by Friday
Davis), Seagate Property Development and Investment Company Ltd
(represented by Agbor Baro), Trans Ocean Property and Investment Company
Ltd (represented by Dioghowori Frederick) and Avalon Global Property
Development Ltd (represented by Taiwo Ebenezer) pleaded guilty to
laundering the monies that have Mrs Jonathan had come out to claim
ownership of. The
companies, along with a lawyer Amajuoyi Briggs and a banker, Adedamola
Bolodeoku, were arraigned before Justice Babs Kuewumi.

Dudafa,
Briggs and Bolodeoku, however, pleaded not guilty to a 17-count charge
brought against them by the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission
(EFCC).
Yesterday,
Dudafa and Briggs, through their lawyers, urged the court to set aside
the guilty plea entered on the firm’ behalf by their representatives. They urged the court to replace the guilty plea with a “not-guilty” plea for the companies. They
also contended that the court lacked jurisdiction to accept the
companies’ guilty plea. Dudafa and his co-accused argued that those who pleaded guilty for the companies did not exhibit any letter authorising them to do so by the firms’ board. They
argued that the prosecution failed to comply with Section 477(3) of the
Administration of Criminal Justice Act, 2015 which specifies that such a
representative must have authorisation. According to Dudafa’s
lawyer, Gbenga Oyewole, the four representatives had earlier made
statements to both the EFCC and the court denying any connection with
the companies and alleging that their names and signatures were forged.
He argued that Mrs Jonathan had
sued EFCC claiming ownership of the funds in the companies’ accounts,
adding that neither the Federal Government not any state had stated that
the funds were stolen from them. According
to him, the same representatives had earlier denied any link to the
companies when they were first charged before Justice Abdulazeez Anka,
who sat during the vacation. He said Justice Anka replaced their guilty plea with “not guilty” after their denial.
“The purported representatives did not produce a statement of appointment by the companies,” Oyewole argued.
Objecting to his argument, counsel to EFCC, Rotimi Oyedepo, said
there was evidence at the Corporate Affairs Commission (CAC) that
Davies, Baro, Fredrick and Ebenezer were the companies’ directors. Oyedepo said the four also had the mandate to operate the Skye Bank accounts where the $15.5million is. He added that the companies representatives were of sound mind and made a deliberate decision to plead guilty.
“The
prima facie evidence before Your Lordship is that those who appeared
before Your Lordship are the directors of the fourth to seventh
defendants (the companies).
EFCC said the accused persons conspired on November 13, 2013 in Lagos to launder $15,591,700. It said the defendants “reasonably ought to have known that the funds form part of the proceeds of an unlawful act”.
Seagate
Property, Dudafa, Bolodeoku and Sompre Omiebi (said to be at large)
were accused of indirectly retaining $1,094,500 through a Skye Bank Plc
account (2110002207) between November 14 and 19, 2013. EFCC said the
money “forms part of an unlawful act to wit: stealing.”
They
were also accused of indirectly retaining $1,200,000 through the Skye
Bank account between January 21 and December 19, 2014; as well as
$1,349,700 through the same account between March 31 and May 20, 2015,
among others.

Related Articles

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Close